LogoPhere Blog - WordPress version
the BS outa'
the BlogoSphere (and MSM) one shovel-full at a time "
-- Daily Darts for
July 05.2014 --
Daily Mail is creeping me out, but are
they breaking US federal law?
Falling all over itself in an attempt to harass Amanda
Knox, the DM papparazi are following her around Seattle. I'd
call it "stalking."
Here's a photo
article by DM creeps Jeff Rayner/Coleman-Rayner (sic) and Sophie
Joe Biden's idiot Violence
Against Women Act also creeps me out b/c it is such a gross
assault on due process and civil liberties, but it's currently the
law. And it says that "stalking" is conduct directed at a
person that would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial
Surely any reasonable woman would be extremely
emotionally distressed to see photos of her with her boyfriend splattered
all over the international press, knowing the photographers were following
them in order to record their personal moments together.
I wish Foxy would stick it to the DM over this crap,
regardless of whether or not she's a blood-thirsty killer.
200 poof . . . of idiocy
Speaking of the DM, as I often do, the screen grab to
the left is from Daily Mail front page Jul05.14
The irony here is that the British Navy invented the
"proof" system for determining alcohol content and yet this
British paper doesn't have a clue what it's all about.
There is no such thing as "per cent
proof." Alcohol content is expressed as either percent by
volume or proof.
In UK proof is 7/4 of alcohol by volume. 68% is
119 proof. DM staff should write their beer articles before
they test the products.
Listen up. . .here's the plan.
Screw the Democrats, screw the Republicans
-- they're all funded/controlled by the sub-%1, of which we are not a
part. Lawrence Lessig is about to torch United v. F.E.C.
with the help of a $10 million grass-roots super PAC -- MayDayPAC.
I think, basically, this is a Tea Party for progressives -- Dick
Armey & Karl Rove need not apply. I am so mad at myself for
throwing away my 3-cornered Yankee Doodle hat and knee-breeches.
It is a well thought-out plan: in 2014 use the crowd-sourced super-Pac to
elect candidates in 5 districts who are committed to reforming campaign
finance. [Not sure I know what that means. Sounds like House
seats, not Senate seats.] This is sort of a "proof of
concept" run. See how it works in 2014 then use that
information to elect a Congress in 2016 that will be committed to
re-writing the laws (and the Constitution, if necessary) with respect to
how federal politics are funded in the US.
They have collected >$5 M in grass-roots money, to be
matched by -- you guessed it -- wealthy donors from the 1%.
Still looking for grass-root support, tho'.
I dunn'o. I thought the message from Cantor's crash and burn
was that all that cash doesn't win elections. Nevertheless, I like
this idea of a people's super-PAC to push back on the Kochs and Soros-style
dollar-domination of politics.
BTW, in case you were wondering, here's how the Alabama
marriage rate is related to people grabbing hot electric lines. Everyone
suspected there was a correlation, but there's nothing like hard data.