Who is running the
114th Congress, the Republicans or the iJews?
a universal spoof that
reporters employ constantly that you have to be on the look-out for.
More often than not
when reporters write a story about politicians not wanting to get on the
sour side of Jews, the reporters will refer to "the Jewish vote"
or "Jewish voters" as the reason for the politicians'
caution. Here's Carl Hulse and Jeremy Peters in the NYT
Democrats have generally condemned Mr.
Netanyahu’s decision to address Congress as undiplomatic and reckless,
but they have conflicting interests: They want to back up the president
without angering the powerful pro-Israeli interests in the United States
or Jewish voters.
What Hulse and Peters really
mean is that Congress is dominated by politicians who are raking in a ton
of money from billionaire iJews (aka Zionists) and they don't want to mess that arrangement up, so
Obama is pretty much on his own in this latest dust-up with Bibi.
By referring to
"Jewish votes" or "Jewish voters," what reporters, especially the Jewish ones or the ones writing for
Jewish-owned media, are trying to do is to make the politicians' hands-off approach to any
criticism of Israel sound legitimate. It's not legitimate. It's bribery. When you
or I send a political campaign $10 or $50, we do it not because we expect the
candidate to listen to us personally, but do it because we want to help "our"
candidate get elected. That is not bribery. But when individuals, or groups, or
corporations give candidates millions, or tens of millions, or hundreds of
millions of dollars -- and I'm talking Haim Saban, George Soros, Paul
Singer, Bernard Marcus, Sheldon Adelson, the Kochs, & etc.
-- then you can damn well bet that those contributors
expect something in return. This is bribery. And when the NYT
papers-over such bribery by saying that politicians are
taking a Jewish viewpoint on an issue because they are concerned about the
"Jewish voters," that is, IMO, blatantly dishonest
The reality is that
except for a handful of kosher precincts like in Brooklyn or Miami, there
is, essentially, no "Jewish vote." If not a single Jew in
the country votes in the next federal election, it will make no
difference in the outcome of races for the vast majority of seats in
Congress, and yet politicians from Massachusetts to Texas to Oregon will
still be falling all over themselves to do Israel's bidding because it's
Jewish money -- not Jewish votes -- that talks.
The whole blow-up over Bibi essentially
inviting himself to speak before Congress without the White House even
being consulted tells you plainly that Republicans don't control the 114th
Congress, iJews do -- Zionists who are itching to pull America into a war
Jews represent less
than 3% of the population, and a tiny, tiny proportion of that 3%
contributes 50-60% of the money that is used to get federal politicians
elected. In this system, money talks, not votes. Whites
represent about ~70% of the population, blacks about 12%, and Hispanics
about 15%. And yet Congress shows no particular interest in
advancing the interests of blacks, or Hispanics, or even American Asians,
whose population is double the number of American Jews. Blacks,
Hispanics and Asian Americans have far, far less of a voice in their own
Congress than Israelis do. All Americans and the rest of the world
take a back seat to the Israelis as far as the majority of politicians in
Congress are concerned. For example, while Israel was destroying the
lives and homes of Palestinians in Gaza during the bloody, prolonged,
disproportionate attack on Gaza last year, the Senate passed by unanimous
Resolution 498 supporting the Israeli atrocity. The
resolution had 79 co-sponsors -- that's 79 senators out of 100 who are
sucking at the teat of Israel and the iJews for campaign
Straight Look at the Jewish Lobby" is a little bit
outdated, but it's a well written,
carefully sourced, and important contribution to this vital issue.
Here are a few of the points
Most of the world regards Israel’s policies, and
especially its oppression of Palestinians, as illegal and
outrageous. This international consensus is reflected, for example,
in numerous UN resolutions condemning Israel, which have been approved
with overwhelming majorities. . . Only in the United States do
politicians and the media still fervently support Israel and defend
its policies. For many years the US has provided Israel with crucial
military, diplomatic and financial backing, including more than $3
billion each year in aid.
- Bishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa, who was awarded the 1984 Nobel
Peace Prize, has candidly identified the reason. Speaking to an
audience in Boston, he said: “But you know as well as I do that,
somehow, the Israeli government is placed on a pedestal [in the US],
and to criticize it is to be immediately dubbed anti-Semitic ...
People are scared in this country, to say wrong is wrong because the
Jewish lobby is powerful -- very powerful.”
- Vanity Fair magazine in October 2007 published
a list of what it calls “the world’s most powerful people” – a
lineup of the one hundred most influential media bosses, bankers,
publishers, image makers, and so forth, who determine how we view
ourselves and the world, and who – directly and indirectly -- shape
our lives and our futures. Jews made up more than half of the powerful
men and women on the Vanity Fair list, reported a leading
Israeli newspaper, The Jerusalem Post. [NB: Half!!! Jews
represent only about 0.3% of the world's population!]
- Jews alone had contributed 50 percent of the funds
for [President Bill] Clinton’s 1996 re-election campaign.
- Admiral Thomas Moorer, former Chairman of the US
Joint Chiefs of Staff, has spoken with blunt exasperation about the
Jewish-Israeli hold on the United States: “I've never seen a
President -- I don't care who he is -- stand up to them [the
Israelis]. It just boggles the mind. They always get what they want.
The Israelis know what is going on all the time. I got to the point
where I wasn't writing anything down. If the American people
understood what a grip those people have got on our government, they
would rise up in arms. Our citizens certainly don't have any idea what
Two points here are
absolutely axiomatic: 1) Money talks in American politics, and 2) there
are enough billionaire iJews with a shared Zionist agenda and enough money
to influence Congress. Given the way the American political system
is set up, these axiomatic points spell out a rolling disaster for
Americans, who have lost control of their government. If Americans don't get this mess sorted out somehow
and neutralize the Israeli control of Congress -- even if it takes a
Constitutional amendment to eliminate election mega-funding and political
bribery -- Americans will find themselves pushed into a world war by their
own Congress working in behalf of Israel instead of Americans.