Jack Lew, Michael Bloomberg, and the
infant oral-genital contact question.
One question that should not automatically be asked of
every nominee for a Cabinet position is: What is your position on oral-genital
contact between adults and infants?
But it is a question that should be asked of Jack Lew, or any other
Orthodox Jew nominated for a Cabinet position, judicial position,
ambassadorship, or any other government position. And the reason it should
be asked is that oral-genital contact between adults and infants is a ritual
practiced by many Orthodox Jews. It is called "metzizta b’peh" by OJ’s,
"orogential suction" by MDs, and "as perverted as it gets"
by the rest of us. Mitzizta b'peh is beginning to be a hot, public subject
in those areas were most of the world's OJs live -- Israel and Brooklyn. Ask Michael
Bloomberg, he’s up to his nose in this disgusting ritual.
The OJs make a big deal of infant male genital mutilation, aka brit milah,
aka male circumcision. But, as amazing as it seems,
according to NYT, a paper that knows something about Jews, some Jewish
mothers who have had numerous sons don't have a clue what's going on during the
ceremony. The baby is taken to them and handed over to the mohel and a few
other males, and no one really sees what is happening. Here's what's going
on (not for the squeamish).
When the baby is 8 days old the parents wrap him in a white blanket and hand
him over to a mohel. (For some reason this all has to be done during daylight,
but I'll leave it to you to figure that part out.) The mohel then lops off the
child’s foreskin, but, unlike surgical circumcision by a physician, the mohel
lops off so much tissue that the circumcision can never be reversed or
obliterated. This is called priah. IOW, not all circumcisions are equal, which
is to say not all mutilated penises are equal. The reason for this extreme
circumcision is that there have been times in history when rulers who hated Jews
identified them by their penises, and a lot of Jews were, naturally, inclined to
reverse or mitigate the damage done to their child’s penis in the hopes of
avoiding persecution. Priah -- or extreme circumcision -- prevents this tendency
to later deny the Jewishness of one’s penis, or one’s son’s penis.
Following the extreme circumcision, the baby at this point is, of course,
bleeding from its lacerated penis. This is when the metzizah – or sucking –
of the penis is performed by the mohel to symbolically remove the blood.
According to Wikipedia,
which is, not surprisingly, very knowledgeable on this whole topic, the Talmud
even warns that a mohel who does not suck should be dismissed from practice.
Some OJ cults like Hasidic and Yeshiva take this genital-oral contact ritual
very seriously, as I have previously
observed. They will not even countenance the use
of a sterile sponge or syringe to remove the ritualistic blood. Which brings us
to Bloomberg (we'll get to Lew).
Brooklyn is, of course, full to over-brimming with OJs. And like every other
group of people, Ojs have their perverts. One of them, rabbi Nechemya
Weberman, just got sent up for doing dirty things with a 12 year old, even
though the OJ’s did their best to keep him out of jail. Story at Post
#526. The other national news from the OJ
community last year was Bloomberg’s war on ritual sucking of baby’s penises.
The problem Bloomberg is concerned about is that some of these mohel’s put
their mouths in places other than baby’s penises and them the babies end up
with herpes, or who knows what. In NYC one mohel infected dozens of
babies. This is devastating for a newborn whose immune system is not up to speed
This practice is not carried out by most Jews, and Jews --
like Bloomberg -- have been among the most vocal critics. Even the Israeli
Pediatric Assoc -- comprising, one would think, their share of Jews -- has called
for an end to of this disgusting ritual. The US is cracking down,
too. The CDC
issued a report stating that the rate of infant
herpes infection caused by mohels just in NYC is about 1 per year. Two NYC
babies died from herpes contracted from a blood-sucking mohel. Others have
been brain damaged. Although the OJs generally will not reveal the
identity of the mohels responsible for these tragedies, according
to the NYT, one mohel, Yitzchok Fischer, was responsible for a
number of them, including at least one death. In 2007 he was banned by health
officials from performing the ritual in NYC.
But it is not just the mohel who is guilty. If you want
to get your skin crawling, have a look at this from The
NY Jewish Week:
The CDC report also notes that one family whose child was infected chose
to use the same mohel on another son three years later, who also became
infected. Further, according to the report, in the case of an infant who died
this past September, “the parents would not directly answer questions about
whether direct orogenital suction occurred.” However, The Jewish Week
obtained recordings of conversations involving family members of the deceased
infant that indicated that [orogenital suction] was in fact a part of the bris
ceremony and that the mother planned to use the same mohel again if she were
to have another son.
If this account is true, these parents ought to have their children taken
away and they should be locked up for child abuse. The Brooklyn
DA was investigating in Mar.2012, but I haven't found the outcome.
Here is the
CDC's analysis of the health situation:
Oral contact with a newborn's open wound risks transmission of HSV and
other pathogens. Circumcision is a surgical procedure that should be performed
under sterile conditions. Health-care professionals advising parents and
parents choosing Jewish ritual circumcision should inquire in advance whether
direct orogenital suction will be performed, and orogenital suction should be
Being a Jew himself and seeing the coming political storm, Bloomberg
initially backed Fischer, the herpes-infected mohel, and blocked attempts to
outlaw Jews’ ritual sucking baby’s penises. But he did agree to allow the
NYC Board of Health to require that the parents sign a consent form before the
ritual could be carried out. This means that if the baby contracts herpes or
some other awful disease from one of these foul-mouthed [literally] mohels, the
parents can be held criminally responsible for child abuse -- and they should
be, with or without the consent form, in my opinion. I cannot believe that
New York and every other state does not have a statute making oral-genital
contact between an adult and child illegal. If exposing your child to a
potentially fatal disease through oral-genital rituals is not child abuse, then we
have become a sick society, indeed.
The NYC Board of Health voted
9-0 for the consent form. Not a
single one of them was willing to be complicit in ritualized pedophilia. And
they are pushing hard to get parents to listen to reason, not religion.
Here is the NYC
Health Department’s webpage on the dangers of this ritual and here is
the simple, direct consent
form, which identifies the parents and the moyle, presumably so they can
all be busted if the baby dies from herpes or some other STD.
Of course the OJ’s went absolutely ballistic -- "a firestorm" is
the way the MSM always puts it. You likely didn’t know this, but there is such
a thing as the American Board of Ritual Circumcision. This is not a joke.
There is also an International Bris [circumcision] Association. These are
groups of rabbis dedicated to protecting ritual genital mutilation, including
metzitah b’peh. And, of course, they are behind the lawsuits that are rolling
in asserting, essentially, that infant ritual-fellatio is their 1st
Amendment right. Link.