Robert Fisk rips Obama and Cameron on their deadly hypocrisy
As the black masters of execution
fled Palmyra this weekend, Messers Obama and Cameron were as silent as
the grave to which Isis have dispatched so many of their victims. He
who lowered our national flag in honour of the head-chopping king of
Arabia (I'm talking about Dave, of course) said not a word. --Robt.
Sunday, Mar27, as Assad's Syrian Arab Army was cleaning up the hundreds of
Da'esh bodies left behind in Palmyra, Robert Fisk of the Independent
published a must-read
piece ripping apart Obama and Cameron for their
utter lack of support of Assad in his battle against Da'esh. Fisk
has probably spent more time with his own boots on the ground in Syria
during this conflict than any other western journalist. He sees a
lot, and he's not timid about telling you what he thinks about what he
sees. But while I applaud and recommend his Mar27 piece, I'm not
sure he's got this right. For what he cannot see are the private
conversations between Obama and Putin and between Kerry and Lavrov.
Over at Moon of Alabama the
discussion turned to whether the SAA's capture of Palmyra is the "turning
point" of the Syrian war. It seems to me the turning point was
in 2014, as I explained in this comment:
Netanyahu is seething. It is now clear that Assad has
slipped the noose. The iJews are writing the script on what their
underling politicians in US/UK say and what the MSM says, so don’t
expect Yankees and Poms to start cheering for Assad. Johnson obviously
didn’t get the memo. The Telegraph didn’t get the memo. And Robt.
Fisk, who takes Obama and Cameron to task big-time in today’s
Independent, got the memo but wiped his *ss with it:
Obama f*cked up Yisrael’s false flag op in Ghouta.
Then he f*cked up by letting Putin crash the party. Or an alternative
theory is that after seeing that he was getting false intel from GoY in
the days after Ghouta, Obama realized he was being played for a sucker
by Bibi and turned to Putin for a way out. After the Ghouta pull-back,
Obama’s and Kerry’s rhetoric suddenly changed from “Assad is a
madman who gasses children” to “it is our position Assad must go,”
and even that has now softened. There was no more of the “gassing his
own people” meme after Putin stepped in and organized the CW disposal.
Maybe there has been some very serious covert
choreography between Obama and Putin that the world doesn’t see and is
not meant to see. So covert that it is beyond the criticism of the
Yisrael-firsters in Congress, which is to say all of Congress. And
beyond the reach of Mossad and the iJews’ news organizations.
This theory suggests that Kobani was not the turning
point. Palmyra is not the turning point. Ghouta was the turning point
even tho' the Ghouta Massacre has, in fact, never been resolved.
James Petras blurts out the question all
us goyim have been asking ourselves: Why all the Jews?
Merrick Garland -- 4th Jew for the USSCt?
A brief perusal of the legal
publications of Elena Kagan and Merrick Garland reveals meager,
mediocre and pedestrian articles and monographs. In the case of Kagan,
her rise to power was facilitated by her relationship with the former
(and heartily voted out of office) Harvard President ‘Larry’
Summers, who appointed her Dean of the Law School despite her lack of
quality publications. Summers, as Harvard President, led a raucous and
bullying campaign against any academic critics of Israeli policies during
his abruptly abbreviated tenure in office. --James Petras
of the unexpected joys of retirement in the age of the Internet is having
time to discover that the world is populated by brilliant people. My
recent encounter with John Pilger's
documentaries, for instance, was like an epiphany. More recently I
have become aware of James Petras' work, and I have become an instant
admirer of him as well.
On Mar26 Petras published a beautifully
crafted analysis of the hugely disproportionate influence of Jews
in American government, judiciary, and policy-making. He asks,
essentially, are these people really so genetically superior that in a
country in which they represent about 2% of the population they presently
occupy 37% of the seats on the USSCt? (And that will go up to 44% if
Merrick Garland is confirmed.) Petras is polite enough not to point this
out, but the flip side of the same question is: Are protestants so
genetically inferior that in a country in which they represent half of the
population they presently occupy 0% of the seats on the USSCt?
It is a long, but meticulously thought-out
apotheosis of expository writing, an honest inquiry that will surely draw
the inevitable calumny of "antisemitism!!" from . . . well, the
malsemites. But that's OK, being called an antisemite has become a
badge of honor for today's honest intellectuals.
Ralph Nader: Hillary's red-hot
AIPAC speech lights up the GoY war crimes against the Palestinians
Israel's goy-to girl
But Mrs. Clinton’s speech was
newsworthy for its moral obtuseness and the way in which it
promised unilateral White House belligerence should she become
president. A reader would never know that her condemnation of
Palestinian terrorism omitted any reference to the fact that
Israel is the occupier of what is left of Palestinian lands,
colonizing them, seizing their water and land, brutalizing the
natives and continuing the selective blockade of Gaza, the
world’s largest Gulag ever since Israel closed its last colony
there in 2005. --Ralph Nader
Nader, the Energizer Bunny of the Left, keeps on going. That
is, he keeps on going ever farther to the left while the rest of the world
is drifting off to the right. But in all of the years I have been
listening to and reading what he has to say, I cannot recall an instance
of him being wrong. He was not wrong about the abysmal lack of
safety in American-made cars back in the '60's. He was not wrong
about the filthy state of America's rivers back in the '70's. He was
not wrong about the greed and incompetence of industrial managers or their
indifference to consumer safety back in the '80's. And he is not
wrong in his Mar25|16
piece ripping into Hillary Clinton, Yisrael's goy-to
As the 2008 campaign was warming up, Nader
Hil as a "panderer and flatterer." In his Mar25|16 piece
he's narrowed that down considerably, or at least he's identified a subset
of Hil's more general pandering and flattering: Yisrael. In
reference to Hil's much-maligned butt-sucking speech to AIPAC, Nader notes
that "Hillary Clinton’s pandering speech must have registered close
to 100% on AIPAC’s checklist [of desirable talking points]."
And then he lit into her.
Nader taking the role of champion of
Palestine's dispossessed victims of Yisrael's genocide and victims of the
goy-to girl's rhetoric that encourages that genocide . . . good for
Ralph. But given the excellent writer he is, Nader's focus is very
tight. Not once does he mention Hil's two Achilles heels:
"Emails" and "influence peddling" -- at least one of
which will certainly
bring her down.