HuffPoo steps in it again
The October IED that backfired
it became clear last
year that Huffington Post's coverage of the 2016
presidential election was nothing
more than a huge in-kind, campaign contribution from Arianna Huffington
Hilton and a continuation of the free-ride given pervert Bill Clinton
Bilton for many years, I took the HuffPoo propaganda site off my list of tabloids to
keep an eye on. My
position is that if media want to endorse a candidate, then do it openly
and keep it on the opinion page. And when you've got a disgusting international,
mega-tabloid like the Daily Fail attacking HuffPoo for shoddy
sensationalist propaganda, that tells you just about all you need to know
about how deep in the gutter HuffPoo has sunk.
The object of the DFail's discontent was an
idiot Nov02|16 article by HuffPoo reporter Ryan Grim: Donald
Trump Is Accused of Raping A 13-Year-Old. Why Haven't The Media Covered
"Jackie"-debacle. Or not.
The objective of Grim's hit-piece was to
make it look not like a hit-piece but an honest inquiry as to what the MSM
is up to. IOW, Grim wanted a way to keep the salacious "Katie
Johnson" kiddie-rape story kicking a week before the election,
but he didn't want to expose himself and HuffPoo to a Rolling Stone
"Jackie"-style debacle and defamation law suit.
Nice try, Ryan. And nicely orchestrated,
for on the day Grim's hit-piece appeared, Nov02|16, "Katie Johnson's" dufus
California attorney, Lisa Bloom, jacked up a "press
conference" so "Katie" could tell the world about her
salacious allegations, but not, presumably, about her DUI's and felony
drug possession convictions. Yeah, six days before the election these
women wanted to grab the world's attention with a kiddie-rape story from
1994 that has not a shred of discernable evidence behind it. It would not
surprise anyone to learn that Lisa Bloom is Gloria Allred's
daughter, Allred 2.0.
Dumb and Dumber. "Katie" (L) & Bloom.
Who would believe this duo?
But then, according to Allred 2.0
"Katie" suddenly got cold feet and backed out of the ball-buster
press conference. However, before "Katie's" feet turned cold,
she gave an
interview to the DFail, which is quite interesting because it
could turn out to be Exhibit "A" when DTDuck turns the table on
On Nov04 -- two days
after Grim published his attempted October IED -- it exploded in his face
when Allred 2.0 dramatically announced that "Katie" had dropped her
so-called "law suit."
Now, this is the second time
"Katie's" suit has been dismissed. The current suit
(16-Civ-04642) was filed in the Southern District Federal Court of New
York in October, but the initial
suit was filed in the Central District Federal Court for
California (16-Civ-00797) in Apr|2016 and dismissed
in May. The first attempt was a pro se suit seeking $110M; I
have not been able to review the documents filed in NY because the court's
Pacer files are not available.
Because "Katie" has now had two
aborted bites at the apple, under Rule
41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure she has a few problems.
I can think of four:
First, "Katie" could become
liable for any costs DTDuck incurred as a result of the California
Second, "Katie" has now
burned all of her judicial bridges. She is not permitted to file the
same claims in any state or federal court.
Third, potentially most troublesome for
"Katie," is the fact that the second dismissal of the suit
operates as if it was a judicial finding in favor of DTDuck.
And what that means is . . .
Fourth, DTDuck now has grounds to sue
"Katie" for malicious prosecution and/or abuse of process.
IOW, that Rolex "Katie" keeps flashing for the press could
end up on Melania's svelte wrist. (One might wonder where that watch
came from anyway. In the California proceeding she claimed she was
impoverished and owned less than $300. Has Peter Thiel, or the Clinton
Foundation, or somebody been bank-rolling "Katie" after her
first botched suit? I mean, Allred 2.0 can't come cheap.)
And so ole' "Katie" may have
worked herself into a tight spot here. And fair enough, too. On Nov02 she
told the DFail that her motivation in going after DTDuck was to keep him
out of the White House. IOW, she has admitted attempting to use the
federal judicial machinery for a political purpose. There was not a chance
in hell that she could have prevailed on her salacious claims even if she
could have proven them. She would have to be dumb as a stump -- and her
lawyers doubly so -- not to know that there was no case because any
applicable statute of limitations would have run out long ago. The alleged
"rape" was supposed to have taken place in 1994, fer crisake.
There are also serious issues about whether
"Katie's" lawyers have subjected themselves to sanctions by
getting involved in this mess. Pursuant to Rule
11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a lawyer can get good
and busted for filing a document for an improper purpose (such as to
harass someone) or if the claims asserted are obviously not warranted by
existing law, such as claims that are a decade beyond the applicable
statute of limitations.
Note to "Katie:"
Your allegations of being raped by DTDuck
are now, judicially speaking, garbage, but even if those allegations
could be proven, that would not give you the right to decide who becomes
or does not become the president of the United States.
Note to Ryan Grim:
The world is full of morally-defective
women who make salacious allegations against famous men with the hope that
the allegations will bring them fame and/or bling, like a Rolex. The
world is also full of dim-wit lawyers who for a price will serve and
facilitate such morally-defective women. By falling for this bullshit, you
are expediting it, and because that appears to have been your intention as
part of HuffPoo's efforts to bring down DTDuck, it makes you, personally,
look like a morally-defective dick, and Lord knows, we've got plenty of
morally-defective dicks of both genders in this cluster-fuck of an
election without you joining the ranks.
News -- reporting on "Katie" dropping law suit
Fail -- reporting Nov02 interview w/ "Katie"
Wanna' chuck in a comment or two? Go to