Tom Suarez, The Unz Review, Jan01|17
How the Israeli State Was Won
The modern-day terrorism model originated in the 1930's with the Jews' vicious
attempts to run the Palestinians out of Palestine -- a terrorist
enterprise that has not abated one whit since then. Suarez walks us
back through a lot of that bloody history. This article is from Suarez's
Dec14|16 speech to the British House of Lords in anticipation of the
coming centennial of the Balfour Declaration, but Suarez pulls no
punches with respect to Britain's role in the Palestine disaster.
Suarez's main theme is that the iJews have always
covertly fostered antisemitism because it is the source of their
self-promoted victimization. He builds this main point on the way the
Weizmann called anyone who opposed his plans for Eretz Yisrael an
"antisemite." It's like the Shoah: the iJews need it, too, and
always have. Hitler literally put the
Jews on the map by means of his grotesque victimization of them. But
in the decades since the
iJews have learned that being a victim has its advantages. If
you can use your victimization to whip up a lot of sympathy, and if you
can convince suckers who had nothing to do with your problems to feel
guilty for them, it might be good for $3.1 billion in US tax payers' money
Here are Suarez's own words on this point:
But let’s just blurt out
the obvious: Virtually all of the alleged anti-Semitism we hear about
from the Zionists is a lie, smears calculated to silence anyone who
seeks to end the horror.
Anyone who would be interested in this
article is likely already aware of the larger history of the iJews bloody,
territorial war against the Palestinians through the 1930s and 1940s.
Suarez gives us even more of the details. I haven't read his new book State
of Terror, How Terrorism Created Modern Israel, but I will. I suspect
when added to Alison Weir's Against Our Better Judgement
one will have a near-complete picture of how the current cluster fuck in
Palestine came to be.
Speaking of Weir, she has a new blog
Andrew Joyce, PhD, The Occidental
Redux: Jewish Identity
and the Shaping of History
are all victims of the iJews' mythology about fleeing Egypt and then being
expelled from a land that was given to them by their god, the so-called
Yahweh. This mythology is embodied in Zionism and in the iJews' concept of
Eretz Yisrael that drives their bold exceptionalism, territorial
expansionism, apartheid policies, and acts of terrorism against the
Palestinians. When identity-mythology becomes politicized and
weaponized, it is a problem for everyone because there is no negotiating
with it. It is, by definition, irrational. And that is just as true
for Zionism as it is for the Wahhabisim that drives the Daesh
But in the case of iJews, their mythology
is forced down the throats of politicians the world over, thereby forcing
millions of unwitting suckers, aka "voters" in democratic
countries, to support Yisrael with their tax money and war dead. And when
identity-mythology ultimately controls nuclear arms, as in Yisrael, the
entire world becomes a victim of that mythology.
In this article Andrew Joyce argues,
based on ancient historical documents, that the Yisrael myth of fleeing
from Egypt is bullshit, which would tend to weaken, if not totally
compromise, the entire iJew historical account of how they came to be
chosen as well as their claim to Palestine.
It is a fascinating piece of ancient
history. At issue here are the writings of a spooky ancient Egyptian
priest named Manetho,
for Manetho's writings dating back to 300 BC pretty much turn the
victimized Jews enslaved by pharaohs into a tribe of leprous, nomadic
trouble-makers. The problem is that Manetho's book Aegyptiaca, has
been lost, and so its contents have been deduced from the works of later
writers who discussed Aegyptiaca 300 years after Manetho lived.
What these deductions tell us, according to Joyce is:
Manetho reported that centuries earlier a
foreign population had entered Egypt’s eastern border via
“infiltration of the Delta.” This foreign population subsequently
rose in power within Egypt, becoming a burden and a pestilence to the
natives. At some point, the foreign population developed a serious
disease of the skin, and the Egyptians were finally motivated to expel
the invaders, who later relocated to Jerusalem.
Many centuries before Uncle Abe Foxman was
ever born, Manetho was being slammed by the "Jewish press" as
being the original politically incorrect antisemite. For instance, the
Jewish historian Flavius Josephus had a go at him in the 1st
century AD. So it goes, Kurt.
Joyce moves adroitly through the conjecture
that Exodus is the result of ancient Jews rewriting Mantheo's Aegyptiaca
in order to make themselves out to be 1) geniuses, 2) victims, and 3)
chosen, with Moses as their demigod. As for the historical Moses,
Joyce points out that . . .
Historian Gohei Hata has argued that by
the time of Josephus at least seven major Greek or Greek-Egyptian
writers and intellectuals had published accounts asserting that Jews had
some distant connection to Egypt, that they had been banished, that they
had suffered from an affliction of the skin, and that Moses himself was
an unstable Egyptian apostate . . . Even if Moses never existed other
than as a kind of Golem squatting in the psychological recesses of the
intellectuals who conceived him, he still retains a kind of
The subject matter of Joyce's article is
pretty much verboten in a MSM controlled by Judeophiles, but I found his
academic treatment of the subject reassuring, and by that I mean it is
reassuring that academics are pursuing the study of Jewish history and
publishing articles that could get them tarred as "antisemetic."
The Jewish identity-mythology is, as I noted above, highly relevant to all
The one thing I would suggest is that
before reading Joyce's account of Manetho you check out the long Wiki
bio on him. It's not completely consistent with what Joyce has to
say. Manetho is, after all, a mystery dude, which is what makes it all
Glenn Greenwald, The Intercept,
Deep State Goes to War with President-Elect,
Using Unverified Claims, as Democrats Cheer
is no buddy of President DTDuck or President DumboDon, who are the same
person, to America's great misfortune. It is a certainty that during the
rolling cluster-fuck that is the Trump presidency has already become, GG will be among the
first and the loudest to take on this pack of ill-informed, self-serving
cretins: the politicians, the advisors, the bureaucrats.
But it is equally clear that GG is going to
be taking on that other pack of ill-informed, self-serving cretins: the
media, regardless of whether they are supporting or opposing the DTDuck
And the reason I mention it is that in this
piece GG shows us his real colors, and those colors are journalistic
integrity and objectivity. This guy is not going to be dupped into playing
shill for one dishonest side or the other regardless how despicable the two
sides are relative to one another. In this piece, GG goes after the
left, the alt-left, and the MSM who have been trying to take down DTDuck and
the American electoral system. Specifically, GG targets the CNN/BuzzFeed
"Russian dossier" cock-up that was likely a product of putrid CIA
malcontents who supported Hilton's failed presidential efforts. But GG goes a
lot broader than taking out the CIA. Here is a snip:
But cheering for the CIA and its shadowy allies
to unilaterally subvert the U.S. election and impose its own policy
dictates on the elected president is both warped and self-destructive.
Empowering the very entities that have produced the most shameful
atrocities and systemic deceit over the last six decades is desperation of
the worst kind. Demanding that evidence-free, anonymous assertions be
instantly venerated as Truth — despite emanating from the very
precincts designed to propagandize and lie — is an assault on
journalism, democracy, and basic human rationality. And casually branding
domestic adversaries who refuse to go along as traitors and disloyal
foreign operatives is morally bankrupt and certain to backfire on those
Beyond all that, there is no bigger favor that Trump
opponents can do for him than attacking him with such lowly, shabby,
obvious shams, recruiting large media outlets to lead the way. When it
comes time to expose actual Trump corruption and criminality, who is going
to believe the people and institutions who have demonstrated they are
willing to endorse any assertions no matter how factually
baseless, who deploy any journalistic tactic no matter how unreliable
and removed from basic means of ensuring accuracy?
The BuzzFeed debacle is pretty much non-news
for the moment, at least in the West. Christopher Steele has been outed as the
ex-MI6 cretin who wrote the "dossier" and he seems to have
disappeared after asking his neighbors to look after his cat. I mean, what
kind of an MI6 agent could he have been if he can't even disappear with
his cat? While Steele and his cat are now off the front pages of the NYT and
Guardian , in
Russia a clean-up operation is underway and FSB heads are rolling. Sergei
Mikhailov, Dmitry Dokuchaev, Kaspersky Labs guy Ruslan
Stoyanov -- all charged with "high treason" in the last few
GG's article was written before DTDuck's
presser immediately following the CNN/BuzzFeed debacle, but it back-ups everything
DumboDon said about this shit storm,
including why NYT's exec editor Dean Baquet deserves a lot of
credit for not printing this crap. From the comments to GG's article,
which I also recommend, here is
a link to a NYT editorial titled The
Case Against Iraq that was published the day after Powell showed the world a vial of talcum
powder and stupid drawings of "bioweapon factories" to "prove" Saddam had
WMD. The suggestion is that just maybe the NYT learned something about
ethics and objectivity in journalism as a result of their catastrophic
promotion of the Iraq War.
The "Russian dossier" story at this point is, in my opinion,
the one GG makes about the despicable efforts the Clintonite Democrats have
gone to to demonize the man who is now President and to delegitimize the
system that was used to elect him, and that story includes the sideline
about GG's personal journalistic ethics and objectivity.
Hugh McInnish, The Unz Review,
Should Be Ashamed
of Fox's unlikely drama about three
black women who saved the US space mission to the moon, now comes a
grumpy old white guy, Hugh McInnish, who was there and who is calling
bullshit on the storyline. Didn't happen, says McInnish. It was actually
a white redneck who computed the flight trajectory.
But that's just the lede of his article.
What McInnish really came here to grump about is the way America treated a Nazi, and
that's what makes this article worth looking at. It raises the question, at
least in my mind, of: Why should anyone freaking care about how America treated any Nazi?
McInnish sort of offers an answer. He relates how in the closing years of
WWII, as the Russians were closing in on Berlin, Americans were able to snatch
up a bunch of Nazi rocket scientists, notably Wernher von Braun and
his gang who had developed the V2,
which took out about 9,000 civilians during the war. But never mind that
awkward fact, which McInnish ignores, these Nazis were quickly given US citizenship and
integrated into the US rocket program. They lived quiet, useful lives as
American citizens putting together America's space mission. And then
the USG lowered the boom on them, packed them up, and sent them back to
One of these displaced Amer-Nazis, Arthur Rudolph, helped
develop the famous Saturn V booster, which was used on the Apollo missions. But once
the Apollo gig was over, the USG accused Rudolph of war crimes, which sounds right to me, and bounced him out of the country. I mean if
designing the rockets that turned London into an ungodly nightmare is not
reason enough to be sent back to Germany, then . . . but I digress.
What's got up McInnish's nose is that in 2014 Obama
signed legislation denying Social Security benefits to these Nazis accused of
US by lying on the immigration documents or during the interview. Yes,
some of these Nazis who were kicked out of the US were still drawing Social Security
in 2014 and as you may recall the media picked up on that peculiar arrangement. So
Congress stopped it.
As fascinating as his story is, I fail to see
McInnish's problem. OK, these were scientists, I get that much. I
understand they were valuable for what they knew and how they could help
America, their prior enemy. But they had been a part of the Nazi
enterprise to develop nukes and the long-range ballistic missiles to deliver
them, which is what the V2 was. The fact that they failed in their goals to nuke the world doesn't mean they were
innocent. Specifically, they were as much a part of the war against Britain as any
of Hitler's top officers and being smart rocket guys can't change that fact.
Social Security benefits?? I don't
understand why they weren't cut up into little pieces and fed to the
Glenn Greenwald, The Intercept, JanGlenn Greenwald, The Intercept, Jan
Corbyn Accused of Being Russian "Collaborator" for Questioning
NATO Troop Build-up on Border
focuses this piece on the way UK Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn
is getting beat up on by UK anserine war-hawks [pun intended] like Mike Penning,
but it is
GG's larger dialog that will make you want to hug your kids.
As GG points out, in the last couple
of weeks we have learned that the UK is sending more troops into Estonia --
not just into the country, but to the border with Russia. The US
is sending thousands of troops to seven countries (Estonia, Latvia,
Lithuania, Poland, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria) adjoining Russia. It's all a
part of the mad NATO saber-rattling that goes by the name Operation
Atlantic Resolve. In addition, a boat-load of Marines just landed in
Norway, contrary to Norway's treaties with Russia not to station foreign
troops. All of this insane posturing is Obama's response to the way Putin
out-smarted Obama and the CIA by exchanging a political advantage in Kiev
for the whole of the Crimean Peninsula.
"Atlantic Resolve." When these idiots start putting
"resolve" in the titles of their operations, success is hardly
guaranteed, but the deaths of thousands of innocent people are, and I'm
talking Operation Inherent Resolve, Obama's gormless war in
Iraq/Syria that appears to have been a covert way of supporting the
head-choppers and has resulted in untold horror and misery for the Syrian
The really scary tid-bit embedded in GG's rant
is his link to an article by Lawrence M. Krauss in The
New Yorker, Oct13|16: The Real Nuclear Threat which is
itself a rant about DTDuck having control of the nuclear button. As
Krauss points out:
When it comes to starting a nuclear war, the
President has more freedom than he or she does in, say, ordering the use of
torture. In fact, the President has unilateral power to direct the use of
nuclear weapons under any circumstances.
And by "president" we now know what is
meant is "DTDuck." Yes, DTDuck has "more freedom" to
ignite a nuclear holocaust than he has to, say, personally ban who enters and
leaves the country. Nixon was able to play the Yisraeli general Moshe Dyan's
game of getting your way in the world by making the world think you are a
madman in charge of nukes. DTDuck, by all indications, isn't playing a game.
He's sure convinced me.
Read GG's piece. Read Krauss'
piece. Go hug your kids. Pray they will grow up in a world that survived
Matthew M. Burke, Newsweek,
Truth About the Lost Marines
of the Vietnam War's Last Battle
I recall reading about this
Koh Tang Island military misadventure
long ago, maybe
in The New Yorker. Perhaps it was an erlier story by Burke. He has told and
re-told the story over th years, for instance in Stars
& Stripes in 2013
and 2015. And
the story has been told by others, too. It's one of the many war stories for
which time is running out if the truth is going to be known.
The three lost Marines were part of a machine-gun team
who were, presumably, captured and executed by Khmer Rouge after being left behind
while giving cover to Air Force evacuation helicopters after a botched Marine raid on
the island. All in all 38 Americans lost their lives in the raid, which was
personally directed by then president Gerald Ford.
Pfc. Gary Hall,
was 18 yo. when he was
presumably executed. According to the Vietnam War Memorial Book of Names,
Hall was from Covington, KY. Pvt. Danny Marshall, from Waverly, WV,
was also 18. LCpl Joseph Hargrove was the leader of the machine-gun
team and was the "old man" of the trio. He died on his 24th
birthday, according to the Book of Names. He was from Mt. Olive, NC.
thing is, the Book of Names gives their day of death as the date of the raid,
May15|1975, but nobody knows when they died, because nobody knows what happened to
them, and that is obviously what is driving Burke to keep writing about the
story. A memorial on Koh Tang Island listing all of the fallen gives the day of death for
these three as "Unknown." One Cambodian who was there says the Marines
were discovered because they were stealing food from the Khmer Rouge, which
suggests they were on the island for days after May15 before being found and,
presumably, killed. Oddly, they are not listed as missing in action in the Book of
Names. Why not? There appears to be no real confirmation that they were
To be historically accurate, the Koh Tang
operation is badly misnamed. It was not "the last battle of the Vietnam
War." For one thing it had nothing to do
with the VN War. Gerald Ford had declared the war over three weeks previously,
and Saigon fell two weeks previously. The incident was precipitated by a
bunch of Cambodians hijacking an American-flagged container ship. IOW, these
Marines were not fighting Vietnamese; they were fighting Khmer Rouge --
Cambodians. Nor was it a "battle." Bull Run was a battle.
The Bulge was a battle. Hue City was a battle. This was a botched
fire-fight that lasted half-a-day.
I suspect that the DoD listed the attack on Koh
Tang as part of the Vietnam War in order to be able to award war-time combat medals and VA
benefits to wounded and to the families of the dead, and fair enough. The 38 KIAs are listed on the final panel
of the Vietnam Memorial, Panel 1W. Whether or not dying in the VN War is an honor depends on
one's view of the VN War, I guess, but the honor of being the last listed on the
inspiring VN Memorial must surely be some solace to the families of these 38
guys. So it goes, Kurt.
What is new in this piece for Newsweek is
that someone tracked down an ex-Air Force Staff Sergeant named Robert Velie
who claims to be the last person in radio contact with the three doomed
Marines. Velie was in an airborne command center above the island when he
got a muffled radio call from the three asking when they were going to be evacuated.
an ex-Marine recon radio operator who was extracted from a number of tight
situations in VN myself, there are some things here that don't make sense to me.
Velie's recollection of talking to these guys on
a radio is odd because a 3-man machine gun team would not be carrying a radio,
certainly not one that they could contact a flying command station with. The main combat radio we
carried, the PRC-25, was an FM radio with range on the short antenna limited to
a few miles. If we needed to
communicate with aircraft, which operated on AM, we had to be relayed through
the communications operation back at the base. And even if these guys found a
PRC-25 somehow left on the beach, and if the air command plane had FM comm on
it, Velie's story would still be strained because the radio
call was supposed to have been made so late in a day of heavy-duty combat that it's
battery would have been all but knackered.
But, as always, a good story on a historical mystery
presents more questions than it answers.
More on this story:
"Battle of Koh Tang, Last Official Battle of Vietnam War
History Now: "The Mayaquez Fiasco -- America's Deadly Last Battle
in South East Asia"
Philip Giraldi, The Unz Review, Jan31|17
Down" British Officials
Wso much of the month dominated by the
Russian-dossier spy story it was almost a relief to come upon a different sort
of spy story by my favorite ex-spy Philip Giraldi. "Taking
Down" British Officials is sub-titled Israel conspires against the
Mother of Parliaments. And I guess so. In this carefully choreographed
article you will learn:
The details of the Shai Masot Israel
spy in London and the list of UK Parliamentarians the Government of
Yisrael (GoY) is trying to "take down."
How the iJews disseminate the pro-GoY message
around the world by taking out politicians who criticize GoY, like US
politicians Cynthia McKinney, Adlai Stevenson III, Paul Findley, Chuck
Percy, William Fulbright, Roger Jepsen, and Pete McCloskey.
How GoY has an international operation to
shut down internet discussions of the iJews' terrorism/apartheid campaign.
What a sayanim is and why you should
avoid them as you travel through the blogosphere.
How UK PM Theresa May is turning out
to be an iFirster non pareil, suggesting she's got a bunch of shekels
pouring into her campaign machine.
How, in whatever country you're in, when you
see an organization named something like "Friends of Israel" or
"Friends of IDF", you know it's a GoY spy organization set up by
Mossad to destroy those who disagree with GoY policies.
In all cases, the objective is the same: to
repress completely, discourage or misrepresent any criticism of Israel and
to block any initiatives that might be taken that would do damage either
to the Israeli economy or to the country’s perceived standing in the
world. In some countries including the U.S. and Britain, Israel’s
advocates work their subversion of local institutions right out in the
open and are highly successful in implementing policies that often remain
largely hidden but that can be discerned as long as one knows what to look
BTW, Comment #2 to this article by Wally provides a very
informative list of links to more detailed discussion of the outrageous
international activities of the iJews.
This is not just a good read. It's information you need to download and archive so when things in the US and UK deteriorate even more, you can look back and see how Giraldi told you so.
Read more from Giraldi about GoY's program to
Giraldi, The Unz Review, Jan03|17: America
or Israel? Quislings in Congress and the Media need to decide which comes first.
Giraldi, The Unz Review, Dec27|16: Welcome
to Greater Israel! The tail will be wagging the dog under Donald Trump
Send it: denis [at sign] logophere [ full stop] com